Mai 2024

The Single Leg Jump for Distance – relevance, outcome metrics and tips for trainers


This article explores the role of a single leg jump for distance test for performance and rehabilitation monitoring, providing valuable insights for trainers and therapists.
Force-time-curve Single Leg Jump Distance

Teile via

Themen in diesem Artikel

Relevance for the sport

The single leg jump distance test (also: single leg hop distance test) is a valuable exercise and functional performance test utilized in both sports performance training and rehabilitation settings for assessing and comparing the maximum neuro-muscular capacity of the lower limbs.

In sports performance training, single leg jumps for distance serve as an essential component of plyometric training. Plyometric exercises, which involve rapid stretching and contracting of muscles, aim to enhance power, explosiveness, and neuromuscular coordination.

In rehabilitation settings, the single leg jump for distance (SLJD) serves as a valid and reliable (1) functional assessment tool to aid in the recovery from lower limb injuries, like ankle ligament ruptures or anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. By assessing an individual’s ability to perform a SLJD, healthcare professionals can identify asymmetries or deficits in movement patterns that may predispose the individual to re-injury or hinder their return to sports (RTS). The limb symmetry index (LSI) serves as a valuable metric to monitor progress throughout the rehabilitation process, ensuring that both limbs achieve a comparable level of function and performance before returning to sport or physical activity.

Test Protocol

The ReGo Single Leg Jump Distance test entails a single-legged horizontal jump executed on a level surface (see Fig-1). Three repetitions are performed with each leg, with the best jump being evaluated. Correct technique for best comparability of results involves positioning the hands on the hips during jump-off, flight, and landing.

Trials are considered invalid if a second hop is necessary to regain balance after landing or if the free foot or the upper extremities touch the ground.

How to perform the Single Leg Jump Distance

Fig-1: Test Procedure of the Single Leg Jump Distance

This test imposes both concentric and eccentric loads on the lower extremities, necessitating maximal muscle activation in a single burst. The primary objective is to achieve maximum distance in the jump.

Follow the link for a more detailed test description of the ReGo Single Leg Jump Distance test, including a step-by-step guide and an instruction video.

Outcome Parameters

The primary outcome parameter of the ReGo Single Leg Jump Distance is Jump Distance.

However, research suggests that only measuring jump distance is not sufficient to detect deficits in knee function after ACL reconstruction (ACLR), even if the healthy leg is used to calculate the LSI (2, 3). That means that patients can achieve a symmetric jump distance, but knee function can still be asymmetric. For instance, patients can unload the injured knee by compensating at the hip or ankle. A study by Ohji et al. (4) from 2021 also indicates that not only symmetric jump performance is important: they found that jump distance normalized to body height of > 70% was positively associated with the athlete’s RTS status.

Moreover, qualitative parameters can help in the RTS decision-making process: The ReGo parameter Ground Reaction Force depicts the force-time-curve of the left and right side, which allows a side-by-side comparison (see Fig-2). The individual phases of the jump, such as the braking and propulsive phases, can be analyzed here.

Force-time-curve Single Leg Jump Distance
Fig-2: Force-time-curve of a Single Leg Jump Distance for the left and right leg

The parameter Balance Point & Sway Area displays the Balance Point as the mean center of pressure (COP) point of the landing foot during the balance phase. The Sway Area is formed as an ellipse which encloses all data points of the COP. Sway Area is also available as a numerical value with the L/R difference in %.

In Vid-1 you can see a tennis player performing the SLJD on her right and left leg. The qualitative video analysis shows that the landing on the left leg is significantly more unstable compared to the right. As a result, more compensatory movements are necessary to get into a stable position. For example, the torso leans to the side and the hands leave the hips to prevent falling over.

Vid-1: Left-to-right comparison of the landing behavior in a SLJD.

This asymmetry in landing behavior is confirmed by the outcome of the Balance Point & Sway Area. As displayed in Fig-3, the Sway Area is considerably larger on the left side, and the Balance Point is located further forward in the metatarsal area.

Single Leg Jump Distance Sway Area Stability Landing
Fig-3: The outcomes Balance Point & Sway Area contain valuable information on the landing behavior.

Further parameters for assessing stability after landing are Stabilization Progression and Time to Stabilization. Stabilization Progression shows the traveling velocity of the COP from the time of landing until 3 seconds after landing. The parameter Time to Stabilization is defined as the time passed for the traveling velocity of the COP to fall below the stabilization limit, with the L/R difference given in %.

In the next section, we will discuss these parameters in more detail by using a specific example.


The following test data is from a 17-year-old junior player from a club in the German Ice Hockey League. About a month before the test was carried out, he suffered an ankle sprain on the right side. In addition, he tore his right ankle ligament about a year prior to the test.
Jump distance is similar on both sides (see Fig-4, left), with only a 3,4% difference. This corresponds to a LSI score of 97%, which is above the recommended 90% level for uninjured subjects and injured patients to complete rehabilitation (5).

Quantitative and qualitative outcome metrics of the Single Leg Jump Distance
Fig-4: Primary and secondary outcomes of the Single Leg Jump Distance

However, as you can see in Fig- 4 on the right, the Sway Area is greater on the right side with a 28.3% difference between left and right. Additionally, the Balance Point is more medial and further forward on the right side.

In line with this, the illustration of the Stabilization Progression (Fig-4, right) shows larger deflections, especially directly after landing. The Time to Stabilization is greater on the right side as well, with a 28.7% difference compared with the left side.

This example illustrates that athletes can achieve a similar jump distance and thus a high LSI value, but qualitative parameters, such as stability after landing, can show significant differences between the two sides, which indicates that the subject is compensating.

Tips for Trainers and Therapists

The next section discusses possibilities to improve rehabilitation outcomes after ACLR. In their 2017 study, Pua et al. (6) highlighted a noteworthy relationship between quadriceps strength measured at six weeks post-ACLR and hopping distance recorded six months after the surgery. The observed correlation suggests that higher quadriceps strength in the early stages of recovery may predict better functional outcomes in the medium term. This emphasizes the importance of implementing structured rehabilitation programs that prioritize strength-building exercises during the initial stages of post-surgical care for ACLR patients.

Research by Isberg et al. (7) and Shaw et al. (8) show that isometric quadriceps exercises are safe to be performed in the first postoperative week and provide benefits regarding knee range of motion and stability. Gokeler et al. (9) and Kruse et al. (10) conclude that including eccentric quadriceps exercises from three weeks after ACLR is safe and yields greater results in quadriceps strength than concentric exercises. Additionally, neuromuscular training can be beneficial in restoring quadriceps strength (9, 10). Furthermore, Van Melick et al. (11) suggest that electrostimulation in addition to conventional rehabilitation might be more effective in regaining muscle strength, especially in the early postoperative phase. There is also evidence that strength training the contralateral leg in the early phase after surgery improves quadriceps strength in the operated leg, which is called cross-education (12, 13).

In summary, prioritizing early quadriceps strength through structured rehabilitation programs is crucial for optimal functional outcomes following ACLR. Evidence supports the safety and efficacy of isometric and eccentric exercises, neuromuscular training, electrostimulation, and cross-education strategies in enhancing recovery and long-term success.

Comments on Measurement Equipment

Historically, the jump distance of the SLJD has been acquired by using tape measure.

In contrast to that, the introduction of the ReGo Sensor Insoles to hop testing as shown in this article presents a paradigm shift for trainers and therapists as they offer a cost-effective, valid, and reliable solution for gaining insights into the entire range of biomechanics involved in the jump, including jump-off force, impulse and timing, as well as metrics related to the quality of the landing, such as the center of pressure (COP) variability.

This allows for identifying how an athlete achieved the performance and which aspects should be subject to development, rather than just considering the distance jumped.

The test results are processed completely automated and unlike traditional laboratory methods, ReGo provides the flexibility to conduct tests anywhere and anytime.

With regards to documentation and performance tracking, ReGo comes with labeling features and access to a reporting frontend which allows users to generate individual or team reports. Individual reports are for one athlete and optionally cover multiple tests such that intra-individual performance development over time can be evaluated. Team reports can be created for an infinite number of athletes and serve to compare inter-individual performance.

For both report types, exclusive reference data is available, covering numerous performance sports and age groups as well as female and male athletes.core/pa Reference data helps to classify the performance of your own athletes compared to average and best outcomes in the sport or age group, hence identifying strengths and weaknesses as a starting point for individualized training programs.

In essence, the ReGo system helps trainers and therapists to enhance accessibility to biomechanical hop testing metrics, making it a valuable tool to support decision making in the RTS process.


1. Reid, A., Birmingham, T. B., Stratford, P. W., Alcock, G. K., & Giffin, R. (2007). Hop Testing Provides a Reliable and Valid Outcome Measure During Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Phys Ther., 87, 337-349.

2. Kotsifaki, A., Korakakis, V., Whiteley, R., Van Rossom, S., & Jonkers, I. (2019). Measuring only hop distance during single leg hop testing is insufficient to detect deficits in knee function after ACL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med ., 54(3), 139-153.

3. Kotsifaki, A., Whiteley, R., Van Rossom, S., Korakakis, V., Bahr, R., Sideris, V., Graham-Smith, P., & Jonkers, I. (2022). Single leg hop for distance symmetry masks lower limb biomechanics: time to discuss hop distance as decision criterion for return to sport after ACL reconstruction? Br J Sports Med, 56, 249-256.

4. Ohji, S., Aizawa, J., Hirohata, K., Ohmi, T., Mitomo, S., Jinno, T., Koga, H., & Yagishita, K. (2021). Single‑leg hop distance normalized to body height is associated with the return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 8(26).

5. Gustavsson, A., Neeter, C., Thomée, P., Grävare Silbernagel, K., Augustsson, J., Thomée, R., & Karlsson, J. (2006). A test battery for evaluating hop performance in patients with an ACL injury and patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 14(8), 778-88.

6. Pua, Y.-H., Mentiplay, B. F., Clark, R. A., & Ho, J.-Y. (2017). Associations Among Quadriceps Strength and Rate of Torque Development 6 Weeks Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Future Hop and Vertical Jump Performance: A Prospective Cohort Study. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 47(11), 845-851.

7. Isberg, J., Faxén, E., Brandsson, S., Eriksson, B. I., Kärrholm, J., & Karlsson, J. (2006). Early active extension after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction does not result in increased laxity of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 14, 1108–1115.

8. Shaw, T., Williams, M. T., & Chipchase, L. S. (2005). Do early quadriceps exercises affect the outcome of ACL reconstruction? A randomised controlled trial. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 51(1), 9-17.

9. Gokeler, A., Bisshop, M., Benjaminse, A., Myer, G. D., Eppinga, P., & Otten, E. (2014). Quadriceps function following ACL reconstruction and rehabilitation: implications for optimisation of current practices. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 22, 1163–1174.

10. Kruse, L. M., Gray, B., & Wright, R. W. (2012). Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 94(19), 1737-1748.

11. Van Melick, N., van Cingel, R. E. H., Brooijmans, F., Neeter, C., van Tienen, T., Hullegie, W., & Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. W. G. (2016). Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus. Br J Sports Med, 50, 1506–1515.

12. Harput, G., Ulusoy, B., Yidliz, T. I., Demirci, S., Eraslan, L., Turhan, E., & Tunay, V. B. (2019). Cross-education improves quadriceps strength recovery after ACL reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 27(1), 68-75.

13. Minshull, C., Gallacher, P., Roberts, S., Barnett, A., Kuiper, J. H., & Bailey, A. (2021). Contralateral strength training attenuates muscle performance loss following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a randomised-controlled trial. Eur J Appl Physiol ., 121(12), 3551-3559.

Select your desired system

The cutting edge test based outcome assessment system for health professionals and trainers

The most versatile toolkit for free data acquisition and comprehensive analytics in research

Have a general inquiry?

Write us a message for general questions about products and solutions or if you’d like to discuss other topics.

Wähle Deine Produktelinie

Mobile Ganganalysen und sportmotorische Tests für Trainer und Therapeuten – objektiv und effizient.

Das flexible System für freie Datenerfassung und fortgeschrittene Analysen in der Forschung.

Du möchtest eine Anfrage stellen?

Schreibe uns eine Nachricht zu allgemeinen Fragen über Produkte oder zu anwendungsbezogenen Themen, die Du besprechen möchtest.

Das Formular wurde erfolgreich gesendet.

Wir werden uns in Kürze mit dir in Verbindung setzen.


Immer einen Schritt voraus!

Abonniere unseren Newsletter für die neuesten Informationen zu Fallstudien, Webinaren, Produkt-Updates und Neuigkeiten bei Moticon

Hole dir Unterstützung

Finde Antworten zu den häufigsten Fragen in unseren FAQ

Beschreibe Dein Problem so detailliert wie möglich. Hänge Screenshots oder Daten an, sofern das hilfreich ist.

Need help?
Want a live demo?
Interested in prices?
Want to say hello?
Always just a call away
+49 89 2000 301 60
Du brauchst Unterstützung?
Du möchtest eine Live Demo?
Interessiert an Preisen?
Du hast Fragen?
Nur einen Anruf entfernt
+49 89 2000 301 60

The form was sent successfully.

You will be contacted shortly.

Get support

Check our FAQ database for answers to frequently asked questions

Describe your issue in as much detail as possible. Include screenshots or files if applicable.