2025

Biomedical Signal Processing and Control

Selection of insole pressure sensors for ground reaction force estimation through studying principal component analysis

Amal Kammoun, Philippe Ravier, Olivier Buttelli

Université d'Orléans, INSA CVL, PRISME, UR 4229, Orléans, France

Keywords

insole measurement, grf components estimation, sensors selection, artificial neural network, pca

Abstract

In the context of low-cost and portable device for measuring pressure using insole system, selection of the relevant sensors is addressed. In a preliminary step, we compared the accuracy of Ground Reaction Force (GRF) components estimation between two pressure insoles: Fscan and Moticon. This estimation was done using Artificial Neural Network combined with Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Secondly, the focus of this study was to identify the optimal numbers and locations of the pressure sensors by a sensor ranking procedure for both insoles using PCA and three selection strategies. The ranking is determined by analyzing the loss value obtained through PCA for each pressure sensor with three selection strategies. Using data from gold standard force plates, we assessed GRF components estimation accuracies and sensor locations for both insoles during walking activities. As a first result, in our context, Moticon insole yielded superior performance for estimating GRF components compared to Fscan. Secondly, the selection procedure allowed deleting 3 among 16 sensors for Moticon (both feet) and 33/30 (left foot/right foot) among 64 sensors for Fscan. Finally, we have validated these optimal numbers by showing that the quality of GRF components estimation was minimally impacted. Remarkably, both insoles with fewer sensors led to better vertical component estimations. These results should be considered in the context of this study, which does not claim to be generalizable. As these results do not reflect a wide range of activities and subject profiles, it is therefore necessary to re-evaluate these selections with other activity conditions.

Moticon's Summary

Kammoun et al. compared the accuracy of Ground Reaction Force (GRF) components estimation between two pressure insoles: Fscan and Moticon. This estimation was done using Artificial Neural Network combined with Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Moticon insole yielded superior performance for estimating GRF components compared to Fscan. The selection procedure allowed deleting 3 among 16 sensors for Moticon (both feet).

Contact Us
Book a free online demo or use the contact form to get in touch
Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates

You Would Like to Get in Touch?

Write us a message on product related questions or with regards to your application.  We are here to assist!


Schedule an Online Demo

Get a hands-on overview of our products, find the best choice, discuss your application and ask questions.

30 minutes

Web conferencing details will be provided upon confirmation

You are currently viewing a placeholder content from Google Calendar. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.

More Information

Stay one step ahead!

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest information on case studies, webinars, product updates and company news

The form was sent successfully.

You will be contacted shortly.

Get Support

Check our FAQ database for answers to frequently asked questions

Describe your issue in as much detail as possible. Include screenshots or files if applicable.