2021

Sensors

Validation of Plantar Pressure and Reaction Force Measured by Moticon Pressure Sensor Insoles on a Concept2Rowing Ergometer

Georgina Kate Barratt, Clint Bellenger, Eileen Yule Robertson, Jason Lane, Robert George Crowther

UniSA: Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia

Keywords

weight-bearing, compliance, pedobarography, gait analysis

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of plantar pressure and reaction force measured using the Moticon and Pedar-x sensor insoles while rowing on a Concept2 ergometer. Nineteen participants performed four 500 m trials of ergometer rowing at 22–24 strokes/min; two trials wearing Moticon insoles and two wearing Pedar-x insoles in a randomised order. Moticon and Pedar-x insoles both showed moderate to strong test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.57–0.92) for mean and peak plantar pressure and reaction force. Paired t-test demonstrated a significant difference (p 1.13), and Pearson’s correlation (r < 0.37) showed poor agreement for all plantar pressure and reaction force variables. Compared to Pedar-x, the Moticon insoles demonstrated poor validity, however, the Moticon insoles had strong reliability. Due to poor validity, caution should be used when considering Moticon insoles to assess changes in pressure and force reliably over time, across multiple trials or sessions. Moticon’s wireless and user-friendly application would be beneficial for assessing and monitoring biomechanical parameters in rowing if validity between measures of interest and Moticon’s results can be established.

Moticon's Summary

This study assesses the reliability and validity of Moticon sensor insoles (previous insole generation, Insole 2) compared to Pedar-x insoles in measuring plantar pressure and reaction force during ergometer rowing. Moticon insoles are practical for on-water rowing due to their wireless setup. Nineteen rowers performed four 500m trials on a rowing ergometer, using both insole types to evaluate test-retest reliability and validity. Results showed moderate to excellent reliability for both insoles (ICC = 0.57–0.92). However, Moticon insoles significantly overestimated pressure and force variables compared to Pedar-x insoles, indicating a lack of validity (Pearson’s 1.13). Despite the overestimation, Moticon insoles demonstrated good consistency, suggesting their potential utility for monitoring in rowing, especially given their practicality and cost-effectiveness. Further research is needed to validate their use for measuring pressure and force over time in various rowing conditions.

Contact Us
Book a free online demo or use the contact form to get in touch
Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates

Schedule an Online Demo

Get a hands-on overview of our products, find the best choice, discuss your application and ask questions.

30 minutes

Web conferencing details will be provided upon confirmation

You are currently viewing a placeholder content from Google Calendar. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.

More Information

You Would Like to Get in Touch?

Write us a message on product related questions or with regards to your application.  We are here to assist!


Stay one step ahead!

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest information on case studies, webinars, product updates and company news

The form was sent successfully.

You will be contacted shortly.

Get Support

Check our FAQ database for answers to frequently asked questions

Describe your issue in as much detail as possible. Include screenshots or files if applicable.