2022

Sensors

Three-Dimensional Lower-Limb Kinematics from Accelerometers and Gyroscopes with Simple and Minimal Functional Calibration Tasks: Validation on Asymptomatic Participants

Lena Carcreff, Gabriel Payen, Gautier Grouvel, Fabien Massé, Stéphane Armand

Kinesiology Laboratory, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Geneva

Keywords

inertial measurement units, gait kinematics, lower limbs, tridimensional kinematics, clinical gait analysis

Abstract

The use of inertial measurement units (IMUs) to compute gait outputs, such as the 3D lower-limb kinematics is of huge potential, but no consensus on the procedures and algorithms exists. This study aimed at evaluating the validity of a 7-IMUs system against the optoelectronic system. Ten asymptomatic subjects were included. They wore IMUs on their feet, shanks, thighs and pelvis. The IMUs were embedded in clusters with reflective markers. Reference kinematics was computed from anatomical markers. Gait kinematics was obtained from accelerometer and gyroscope data after sensor orientation estimation and sensor-to-segment (S2S) calibration steps. The S2S calibration steps were also applied to the cluster data. IMU-based and cluster-based kinematics were compared to the reference through root mean square errors (RMSEs), centered RMSEs (after mean removal), correlation coefficients (CCs) and differences in amplitude. The mean RMSE and centered RMSE were, respectively, 7.5° and 4.0° for IMU-kinematics, and 7.9° and 3.8° for cluster-kinematics. Very good CCs were found in the sagittal plane for both IMUs and cluster-based kinematics at the hip, knee and ankle levels (CCs > 0.85). The overall mean amplitude difference was about 7°. These results reflected good accordance in our system with the reference, especially in the sagittal plane, but the presence of offsets requires caution for clinical use.

Moticon's Summary

In this study, researchers evaluated a 7-IMU system to compute 3D lower-limb kinematics in healthy adults by comparing it to an optoelectronic system. Participants wore pressure insoles (Moticon) for another project, but the data from the insoles were not analyzed in this study.

Contact Us
Book a free online demo or use the contact form to get in touch
Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates

You Would Like to Get in Touch?

Write us a message on product related questions or with regards to your application.  We are here to assist!


Schedule an Online Demo

Get a hands-on overview of our products, find the best choice, discuss your application and ask questions.

30 minutes

Web conferencing details will be provided upon confirmation

You are currently viewing a placeholder content from Google Calendar. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.

More Information

Stay one step ahead!

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest information on case studies, webinars, product updates and company news

The form was sent successfully.

You will be contacted shortly.

Get Support

Check our FAQ database for answers to frequently asked questions

Describe your issue in as much detail as possible. Include screenshots or files if applicable.